Furiosity Mission Summary

Summary

My third launch was entitled Furiosity. The purpose of this mission was to build a cheap and modular platform to easily and quickly send payloads to high altitude.

It was based on 2 modules: A system module and a payload module. The system module included 2 GPS trackers, a solar powered APRS transmitter, a sensor data logger and 3 cameras. The payload module contained the experiments built by 2 teams of students from Valley Christian High School in Dublin, CA

Furiosity was launch from the pacific coast near Pescadero, CA. It followed the predicted flight path and reached an altitude of almost 119,000ft. At which point, the balloon burst and the capsule fell back down to earth at an unusual fast speed. More than 180mph. It only started to really slow down at 50,000ft. It fell 100,000ft in 15 minutes. We followed its trajectory until all communications suddenly stopped at 9000ft.

Despite intensive ground search, I was not able to locate it.

Flight Path from launch to last signal received

Furiosity breaking 100,000ft

Hardware

Cameras Canon PowerShot SD1200IS + 4Gb SD Card (photo script w/CHDK)
GoPro + 32Gb SD Card (Class 10)
GoPro2 + Battery BackPack + 32Gb SD Card (Class 10)
Power  6V 3.7W Solar Panel x2 + Solar Lithium Ion/Polymer charger + MintyBoost
Lithium Ion Polymer Battery & Energyzer Lithim ultimate batteries
Computer System Arduino UNO + sensor shield V5 + data logging shield
Sensors Digital Temperature Sensor module DS18B20 x2
Light sensor module
Trackers Byonics Micro-Trak RTG + Byonics GPS4
Trackuino 
Parachute 6ft Parachute

Flight Data

Launch Date 4/7/2012
Launch Point 37.235842,-122.416068 near Pescadero, CA
Retrieval Date -
Landing Point -
Balloon Lift -
Total weight ~4.4 lbs
Highest Altitude 118,855ft (36,227m)
Distance traveled ~71miles (115km) (estimation)
Flight Duration 2h20min (Ascent took 2 hours)
Average ascent rate 1016ft/min
Average descent rate 6150ft/min
Max fall rate 185mph (300kmph) at 70,000 ft
Landing speed -

The fast descent seems to indicate a parachute entanglement. We were using a 1600g weather balloon. Bigger and heavier than the 1200g balloon used in my previous flights. The balloon never completely bursts, it’s possible it collapsed the parachute or that it got tangled up with the parachute.

The parachute system did not completely fail as the fall rate at 8000ft was about 25mph.

Vertical Speed (mph) vs Altitude (ft)

Experiments

  • Experiment 1:
    High-Altitude Radiation Repercussion Yields (HARRY)  by Jarrod Poston

Intro: HARRY will demonstrate the mutational effects of radiation on produce, particularly plant seeds. This will later give us insight on measures that will need to be taken to protect plant life while being transported in the upper atmosphere. If in the future scramjets, aircraft that will make traveling shorter by jumping into the upper atmosphere or space, are used then this test on the effects of high-altitude radiation will be critical in showing that you need or do not need technology to protect organic cargo from the effects of high-altitude radiation.

Description: HARRY will be conducted using a high-altitude weather balloon to carry a capsule containing it. Inside the capsule will be a diverse range of different seeds held in their own sterile, plastic bags of the same size. On the earth there will be another set of seeds held in sterile, plastic bags of the same size for the same amount of time in the same amount of light. After the radiation exposed seeds return to Earth, both sets of bags will be opened, physical appearances on the outside and inside will be examined, and the left over seeds from each group will be planted. All seeds from the same species will be exposed to the same conditions, nutrition, and water. The plants will be observed during the plant life cycle to see if there are any distinct differences between the radiated and non-radiated plants. Even after reproduction the plants and their offspring will be observed and data compiled. In the end, the data will be charted and analyzed, and a conclusion will be drawn.

Set-up:

  1. Problem-Are seeds affected by high-altitude radiation?
  2. Hypothesis-I believe that the radiated plants will have some apparent mutations, while their offspring will have more mutations.
  3. Experiment-As described in the “Description” above.
  4. Materials-Small plastic bags, labels, pots, soil, water (and sunlight), nutrients, table space, microscope, microscope slide materials, lab knifes, weather balloon, and capsule.
  5. Control-Seeds in sterile, plastic bags of the same size.
  6. Variable-Radiation.
  7. Data-Will be plant looks, including the following; disfigurations, color, height and other dimensions, and offspring physical characteristics as listed beforehand, plus, ability to reproduce.
  8. Conclusion-TBD. Will be published and maybe used in a Science Fair.

End: This experiment should help us answer the question of how plants are affected by high-altitude radiation, and it should lead us to many more questions to be answered in the future.

  • Experiment 2
    Cosmic ray capture by Tiffany Lee and Christine Chen

·       Requirements: We require rolls of ultra-sensitive film (1600 ISO and 3200 ISO) as well as a lightproof container to prevent the damaging of the film. The lightproof container will be a Delta 1 Light Tight Safe-T-Bag. The effects of temperature should not affect the results of the experiment.

·       Hypothesis: Due to the balloon’s near-space elevation, gamma rays, which are blocked by Earth’s atmosphere, should be captured by the high-sensitive film, as well as other rays such as X rays & alpha and beta particles. The lightproof bag should properly prevent any light from damaging the film; while, the radiation that we hope to “catch” should be able to penetrate through the lightproof bag well enough that we can observe the effects of radiation upon the film.

·       Expected results: As a result of radiation that the film is exposed to, we expect to see some “points: or traces of radiation from which we can analyze the markings and determine which type(s) of radiation our film was exposed to and “captured”.

Sensor data

The only sensor data retrieved was sent by radio during the flight. (Time is in UTC)

Battery voltage (in Volts) of the radio transmitter

 Temperature (in degrees Celsius) inside the transmitter enclosure

We would think that the 2h ascent would cool the capsule to its lowest temperature. It’s interesting to see that during the descent (The balloon burst at 20:17 UTC = 1:17pm PST) the friction of the cold air cooled the capsule even more. (Above 15,000ft, the air is usually colder than 33 degrees F (0 degree C)))

Pictures

The system module

The payload module

Filling the weather balloon

Activating the trackers

Checking the telemetry

Recovery

Landing predictions

We lost contact 2h20 into the flight at 8800ft. Based on our predictions, it landed in a fairly dense farmland. Without accurate GPS coordinates, we were not able to locate it.

Conclusions

  • Bad mounting between the capsule, the parachute and the balloon is the most likely cause for the parachute failure and very fast fall rate.
  • We can only imagine the chaos of the descent. At such speed, the solar panels probably broke and a severe spin could have disconnected the radio antenna or the power source of the GPS transmitters.
  • A compact positioning system such as a Spot tracker or a cell phone would have survived the fall and communicated the landing location. APRS transmitters are good for live telemetry only.
  • The solar panels made the capsule unstable by design.
  • The Burst, Descent and Landing phase of a high altitude launch has many similarities with the Entry, Descent and Landing phase of a space probe.
    It’s the most critical phase and it should dictate the capsule design and layout.
Special Thanks to Melissa Greer at Valley Christian High School for helping me making it happen and my friends  Boris and Bogee for their invaluable patience and efforts.

Next Mission: “Furiosity” set to launch in February [Update 12/01/11]

The last two prototypes allowed me to get a better understanding of the challenges, the possibilities and decide on what I want to focus on the next mission.

My main goal is to perfect a modular high altitude balloon bus: A simple , low-cost, general purpose high altitude platform able to carry a variety of payloads. It will allow more launches for less money. I will primarily focus on designing and building the bus. I would like another team to work on the payload(s). The latter will be flown free of charge.

I am currently trying to partner up with a high school. I’d love to involve some students, give them the opportunity to fly a small experiment and get excited about space! The next mission is entitled Furiosity and is scheduled for launch in November.

Update (12/01/11):

I have been able to create a partnership with Valley Christian High School in Dublin, CA. I cannot give all the details yet but some students will work on a couple payload systems for my next launch.  I have pushed the launch back to February to allow them to work on it. More details to come in December.

MSP-2 Summary

SF Bay Area from 95000ft

Description

The main difference with MSP-1 resides in the tracking system. I got the technical radio operator license in order to get a HAM radio call sign. My call sign is KJ6MUD. I was then able to use an APRS tracking system. I chose the Byonics Micro-Trak 8000 FA for its simplicity and light weight. The radio transmitter was connected to the Byonics GPS4 which does not have the 60k ft altitude limit.

Tracking the payload after the launch was very easy and accurate. It was set to send its position every minute.


Flight Path from launch to landing


MSP-2 at its highest altitude

All trackers worked very well, each showing the same data.

Hardware

Sensors Internal and External Temperature Sensors DS1620
Photo Resistor VT935G-B
Cameras Canon PowerShot SD1200IS + 4Gb SD Card (photo script w/CHDK)
Canon PowerShot SD880IS + 8Gb SD Card (video mode)
Batteries (SD880IS) Canon Battery Pack NB-5L (Battery Life 36min-ish)
(SD1200IS) Canon Battery Pack NB-6L (Battery Life 4h10-ish)
Camera Shots 1314 pictures (3648*2736) (1.84Gb)
Video Camera Go Pro HD Hero + 32GB SD Card + Battery Backpack
Computer System Parallax HomeWork Board
Trackers Byonics Micro-Trak 8000 FA + Byonics GPS4
SPOT Personal Tracker
Motorola i296 + accutracking application
Parachute 6ft Parachute

Flight Data

Launch Date 4/9/2011
Launch Point 38.494923,-121.75044 near Davis, CA
Retrieval Date 4/10/2011
Landing Point 37.720520, -121.615260
Balloon Lift ~3.5 kg Gross Lift
Total weight ~1.7 kg
Highest Altitude 95,581ft (29,133m)
Distance traveled 54 miles (87km)
Flight Duration 2h10min
Average ascent rate 1125ft/min (343m/min)
Average descent rate 2254 ft/min (687m/min)
Max fall rate 128.3 mph (206.4 km/h) at 76,245ft (23,239.5m)
Landing speed 14 mph (22.4km/h)

Sensors

The computer system did not work as planned. The data from the external temperature sensor and photo resistor does not make any sense. It could be due to a bad mounting (no protection against the wind and the sun…).

The micro-controller had an operating temperature of -40 to +185 °F (-40 to +85 °C) but the internal temperature sensor stopped working at -4°F (-20°C ). It had been thoroughly tested at low temperatures. It could be due to hardware failure (wire disconnection?).

The internal temperature sensor stopped working during the descent.

Internal temperature

The camera sensors worked the whole time.

 (Temperature in °C)

Battery Voltage (in mV)

This is actually quite surprising. I thought that 3600mV was the hard deck for Canon cameras. But I wrote an intervalometer  script in ubasic to disable the LCD and take pictures every 10 seconds. Disabling the LCD had a substantial impact on the battery life.

The camera battery lasted 4h20min and took 1314 pictures. The standard battery life was 260 pictures!

Pictures

The ascent:



Travis AFB

The San Francisco Bay Area from 95500 ft:

South Bay

San Francisco (You can guess the Golden Gate and the Bay Bridge)

North Bay

Sacramento Valley

Recovery

MSP-2 landed after a 2h10min flight. It landed in a wind farm, east of Livermore, CA.

Despite having the GPS coordinates, when typed into the Google maps application, it did not return the location entered but the location of the closest road, several hundred yards away. We couldn’t find it the first day, I had to come back the next day.

When it landed, the winds got so strong (40+mph), the payload got dragged about 200 yards uphill.

What is left from the balloon. It never completely bursts:

The lines are twisted all the way down and the GoPro Camera is gone:

Despite the scotch tape and the super-lock strips, most of the devices are now moving free.

Conclusions

  • Tracking MSP-2 was easy and reliable. (Using APRS was definitely the way to go)
  • Recovering a Near Space Balloon is always hard; Start your pursuit as soon as possible. Do not trust your smartphone. You need a laptop with Internet connection.
  • The descent is a very rough ride. You need to secure the critical devices very well (trackers, tracker batteries, Gopro…). Since the capsule can land in any position, it is necessary to set the Spot tracker in a gimbal system.
  • The computer system and sensors need to be soldered all together
  • You definitely need to be at least 2 people to launch a high altitude balloon

My most sincere thanks to my friend TJ without whom I would not have been able to make it.

MSP-1: Summary

 

Launch Date 12/31/2010
Launch Point 38.494923,-121.75044 near Davis, CA
Retrieval Date 01/26/2011
Landing Point 38.00134 , -120.80861
Payload Mass ~1kg
Balloon Kaymont KCI TX1200
Balloon Lift ~3.5kg Gross Lift
Highest Altitude ~100,000ft (~30Kms)
Sensors External Temperature Sensor LM34
Camera Canon PowerShot Sd880IS + 4Gb SD Card
Battery Canon Battery Pack NB-5L (Battery Life 1h30-ish)
Camera Shots 613 pictures (2816*2112) (1Gb of pictures)
Video Camera Go Pro HD Hero + 32GB SD Card
Movies 4 (total movie time 2h05)
Computer System Parallax HomeWork Board + Datalogger
Communications SPOT Personal Tracker & Motorola i296 + accutracking application
Parachute 6ft Parachute

The external temperature sensor failed but I recorded the values from the camera temp (Celcius) and voltage sensors over time (minutes):

Temperatures from the Camera sensors

Temperatures from the Camera sensors

Voltage from the Camera sensor

Voltage from the Camera sensor

The Canon camera and GoPro video-camera stopped working mid-flight because the batteries died. The voltage drops are due to the flash (while still on the ground). It should have been disabled.

The GoPro is still functioning very well. So are all the other trackers and computer systems. The Canon Camera’s video mode and on/off button are not working anymore. It is still able to take pictures with normal quality.

The communication cutoff is due to the camera module being placed directly above the tracking module. With no satellite acquisition both devices stopped transmitting any position report (even if the phone had good GSM reception).

The bad mounting and the very thin shroud lines induced the payload spin.

All in-flight pictures: